|
|||||||
| Applications Talk about all Apple related software |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| 08-20-2009 | #11 (permalink) | |
|
Operator
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| 08-20-2009 | #12 (permalink) |
|
Assistant Store Manager
|
MakeupGourmet: This thread is about making video calls on a mobile phone, not a computer. Thanks for your posts, but they are not relevant.
Trying to find posts where you can insert link to your site to improve SEO isn't appreciated. If you do have some relevant insight to provide, we'd all love to hear it.
__________________
iMac Intel Core Duo 17" 1.83Ghz, 2GB Crucial RAM | iPhone 3GS (16GB) Twitter | Business Twitter | Maplewood, New Jersey Professional Photographer: Ben Drucker Photography |
|
|
|
| 09-07-2009 | #13 (permalink) |
|
Operator
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 8
![]() |
1st generation mobile phones --> Analog Voice
2nd generation mobile phones --> Digital Voice (GSM) + SMS 2.5 generation mobile phones --> Digital Voice (GSM) + Digital Data (GPRS) + SMS 3rd generation mobile phones --> Digital Voice & Data simultaneously (WCDMA) + SMS 3.5 genaration mobile phones --> Digital Voice & Fast Data simultaneously (HSPA) + SMS iPhone 3G is 3rd generation mobile phone iPhone 3GS is 3.5 generation mobile phone One of the prime uses of 3G technology is Video call. And of course multi-tasking between voice call and data upload/download (for e.g. internet). Today, when a 3G phone is launched in the market it definitely has video calling capability by default. Therefore when iPhone came out without it, it shocked me. Yes, it needs a forward facing camera (may well be a low resolution one) which the iPhone does not. Therefore Skype cannot fill this gap. Yes, video calling was very expensive (£0.50 per minute) when 3G was launched but now it is much much cheaper, may even be included as free minutes on your calling plan. You may not always use it but how many features on your phone do you always use? I personally would ocassionaly use it, for e.g. to see/talk with family while travelling. Apple may have had a different idea on mind before launching the iPhone, or they may have just wanted very short time to market their first iPhone to the world. But I think it is high time after over 2 years and 3 iPhone models they still do not have this feature. After all the forward facing camera is dirt cheap for the price of iPhone a customer pays!! I think Apple also had very limited Bluetooth support, donno if this has changed with the newer model. So as far as I am concerned I will have to wait on the iPhone till it comes as a complete solution for my needs. |
|
|
|
| 09-07-2009 | #14 (permalink) | |
|
Assistant Store Manager
|
I have yet to hear a good reason for video calls on a phone. I'm not sure about your claim that:
Quote:
Also, you will find that Apple does not cater to every person. If you want a phone with 2 cameras, full customizability, and the ability to do everything under the sun, the iPhone is not for you. If you are looking for a "complete solution", you should look at one of the Linux phones or something. They suck, but they do virtually everything, including, I'm assuming, video calls. The fact is though, video calls are a tiny market, and I doubt it influenced a significant number of people to not purchase the iPhone. The fact is, the iPhone will never be a complete solution. In the end, as much as it has shortcomings, it has the fewest of any phone out there. With regard to bluetooth, what are you trying to use it for? Apple has beefed up its bluetooth support in the newer software releases, so what you're looking for may have been added.
__________________
iMac Intel Core Duo 17" 1.83Ghz, 2GB Crucial RAM | iPhone 3GS (16GB) Twitter | Business Twitter | Maplewood, New Jersey Professional Photographer: Ben Drucker Photography |
|
|
|
|
| 09-07-2009 | #15 (permalink) | |
|
Mac Genius
|
Quote:
I've owned 4 3G capable phones. Not once have I used it to make a video call, I have however used them for data services, but until the iPhone that was limited to checking football scores. Data is the prime use for 3G and faster technology in the mobile world, not video calling. |
|
|
|
|
| 09-14-2009 | #16 (permalink) | |
|
Personal Shopping Specialist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 217
![]() |
Quote:
...Yes, no offence to Linux, but those phones are terrible, but yes, they do video calling (or at least the one I had did...) OMG!!! I hate the bluetooth, it doesnt connect to my friends phones (Nokia, LG, Samsung) or my MacBook (Snow Leopard, Bluetooth Firmware up to date) BTW: I smashed my iPhone screen so its getting fixed at the moment, so I cant do anything to it... EDIT: Sorry for cutting your post BBB, but it was kinda too long, my post woulda taken up a whole page ![]()
__________________
Once you go mac, you never go back! My macs: Aluminum MacBook, iPhone 3G 16GB, iPod Nano (5th Gen. Aluminum). |
|
|
|
|
| 09-18-2009 | #17 (permalink) |
|
Operator
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 8
![]() |
I think I worded my post incorrectly. Voice + data on the same connection is one of the most challenging tests for the 3G technology and yes, it is like pushing your device to the limits. The network, however, should not struggle because it should be able to support such connections with multiple devices simultaneously. The front facing camera is usually not a megapixel cam so the data load is not too high. But it is great for video call (3G) or video chat (Skype, GoogleTalk, etc..).
I would use it so that my little one could see daddy and I could see her. If you see from their perspective, it would be so much joy! Since the new mobile phones are packed with powerful processors and so much more, I'm sure the camera would be useful in other ways too, just like we use the one our Macbooks. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|